Dane Sweeny vs Alexander Klintcharov Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
D. Sweeny vs A. Klintcharov

Dane Sweeny
AUS
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
l
w
2
Win
3
Played
1
Win
24
Age
29
5'7" (170 cm)
Height
-
215
C. Rank
823
194
Best Rank
730
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$346.1K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Alexander Klintcharov
NZL
w
l
l
w
w
l
w
l
l
l
2
Win
3
Played
1
Win
24
Age
29
5'7" (170 cm)
Height
-
215
C. Rank
823
194
Best Rank
730
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$346.1K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Sweeny 2 - 1 Klintcharov
They have played 7 sets in total, with Dane Sweeny winning 4 and Alexander Klintcharov winning 3. The last match between Dane Sweeny and Alexander Klintcharov was at the M25 Burnie, 20-02-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Dane Sweeny getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sweeny | 2 |
| Klintcharov | 1 |
Last 3 H2H Matches:
(R2) M25 Burnie(02-20-25)
Dane Sweeny
6
6
Alexander Klintcharov
4
4
(R1) M25 Timaru(02-12-25)
Alexander Klintcharov
6
7
Dane Sweeny
3
6
(Q2) M25 Brisbane(09-29-19)
Dane Sweeny
4
6
10
Alexander Klintcharov
6
2
1
D. Sweeny vs A. Klintcharov H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $346,065 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 59.95% (238-159) | Career Total W/L | 52.65% (159-143) |
| 2 | Hard | 1 |
| 15 | Titles | 0 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
D. Sweeny vs A. Klintcharov Match Preview:
- Recent Second Serve Performance: Over the past six months, both Klintcharov and Sweeny have showcased exceptional skills in their second serve performance. Klintcharov has triumphed in 48.26% of points on their second serve, while Sweeny boasts a slightly higher success rate of 48.32%. It is noteworthy that there exists a profound correlation between this particular statistical aspect and the accuracy of match predictions.
- Return Game Statistics: Another crucial set of statistics that provides valuable insights into the upcoming tennis match is the return game performance. Recent data reveals that Klintcharov has impressively won 51.44% of their opponents' second serve points, while Sweeny trails closely behind with a success rate of 48.38%. Moreover, when considering first serve returns, Klintcharov boasts a 36.37% triumph rate, compared to Sweeny's 29.61%. These return game statistics play a pivotal role in determining the favorite in the highly anticipated head-to-head matchup.
- Under Pressure Analysis: In analyzing the players' ability to handle pressure situations, Klintcharov has demonstrated remarkable skills by saving 61.42% of breakpoints in recent matches. On the other hand, Sweeny has successfully saved 53.03% of breakpoints, showcasing commendable resilience. These numbers prove to be valuable when making in-game betting predictions, as they offer insights into the players' composure under pressure.
- Performance Overview: Considering their performances over the past year, Klintcharov has emerged victorious in 61.11% of matches played, boasting a formidable win/loss record of 44/28. In contrast, Sweeny has achieved a win percentage of 31.58% with a win/loss record of 12/26. These overall statistics provide a comprehensive overview of the head-to-head prediction.
- Surface Specialization: Examining the players' performance on different surfaces reveals interesting trends. Klintcharov excels on clay courts, securing an impressive 65% win rate with a win/loss record of 31/17. However, their performance on hard courts dips slightly, with a win rate of 51% (win/loss record of 100/97). Conversely, Sweeny demonstrates their prowess on hard courts, achieving a 59% win rate (win/loss record of 142/100). Yet, their performance on grass courts remains subpar with a 25% win rate (win/loss record of 2/6).
- Player Level: When evaluating the players' levels based on the events they have participated in, Klintcharov has predominantly competed in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a remarkable 63.24% win rate (win/loss record of 43/25). Contrarily, Sweeny has predominantly faced challenging opponents in the Challenger/ITF tournaments >$10K, achieving a win rate of 31.25% (win/loss record of 10/22). Consequently, the players' statistics and predictions should be analyzed with consideration to the event level at which they have been participating.
- Direct Head-to-Head Matches: These formidable competitors have previously clashed on two occasions. Klintcharov emerged victorious once, while Sweeny secured a victory in another encounter. Overall, they have battled through five intense sets, with Klintcharov triumphing in three of them and Sweeny claiming victory in two. The most recent contest took place at the M25 Timaru, on 12-02-2025, on a hard court, where Alexander Klintcharov emerged triumphant with a score of 6-3, 7-6(6).
- Head-to-Head Match Duration: In past head-to-head encounters, the average match duration between these skilled players has lasted approximately 1 hour and 15 minutes.
- Deciding Set H2H Prediction: Throughout their clashes, Klintcharov and Sweeny have navigated a deciding set just once. Interestingly, Sweeny emerged victorious in this sole encounter, while Klintcharov was unable to secure a win. This information proves to be particularly useful in predicting the outcome if the match extends to a decisive set.
- Head-to-Head Extreme Pressure Situations: When faced with intense tiebreak situations, Klintcharov has shown remarkable prowess, winning all tiebreaks against Sweeny. Meanwhile, Sweeny has been unable to secure a victory in such high-pressure situations.
- Opponent Quality Statistics: Analyzing the opponents faced by both players over the past year reveals intriguing insights. Klintcharov has consistently tested their skills against opponents with an average rank of 269.86, whereas Sweeny has faced players with an average rank of 340.63. These opponent quality statistics shed light on the level of competition each player has encountered.
- Deciding Set Performance vs. All Players: Delving deeper into the players' performances in deciding sets, Klintcharov has emerged successful in 41% of such crucial situations over the past year. Conversely, Sweeny has achieved a 36% success rate. These statistics provide valuable guidance for live predictions and betting, particularly when the match extends to a deciding set.
- Current Event H2H Statistics: While past player performance is invaluable for predicting match outcomes, it is equally imperative to scrutinize current event statistics to assess the players' current form. It is essential to check the section below for the most up-to-date statistics if the players have already competed in the current event. Moreover, it is essential to consider that certain players may exhibit superior performances at specific events, influencing the outcome significantly.
- Break Point Conversion: Assessing the players' ability to convert breakpoints reveals valuable in-game live betting tips. Klintcharov has demonstrated proficiency, converting 37.87% of breakpoint opportunities, while Sweeny has achieved a slightly lower conversion rate of 35.77% when presented with chances to break their opponents' serve.
- If you are intrigued by the intricate world of tennis match prediction models, this article provides an excellent starting point. However, be forewarned, as it caters to devoted statistics enthusiasts exclusively.
Dane Sweeny vs Alexander Klintcharov Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
D. Sweeny vs A. Klintcharov H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 41 | Games Won | 30 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:12:42 | Average Match Time | 1:12:42 |
| 64% (80/125) | 1st Serve % | 82% (108/132) |
| 74% (59/80) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (73/108) |
| 53% (24/45) | 2nd Serve Win % | 58% (14/24) |
| 33% (4/12) | Break Pts Won % | 43% (3/7) |
| 34% (45/132) | Return Points Win % | 34% (42/125) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Sweeny 52%, Klintcharov 52%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Sweeny 56%, Klintcharov 48%.
Break Points Saved %: Sweeny 61%, Klintcharov 58%.
D. Sweeny Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | W | 2-0 ret. | ||
SF | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
QF | W | 5-7 6-3 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-0 6-1 | ||
A. Klintcharov Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-1 6-0 | ||
R2 | L | 7-5 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||
QF | L | 6-4 4-6 7-5 | ||

D. Sweeny vs A. Klintcharov Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.95% (238/159) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.65% (159/143) |
| 56.39% (521/403) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.43% (366/319) |
| 52.80% (4566/4082) | Games Win/Loss | 51.87% (3349/3108) |
| 63.66% (205/117) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.22% (112/111) |
| 43.59% (17/22) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.00% (33/22) |
| 36.84% (7/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 52.94% (9/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 60.87% (14/9) |
| 0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 860 | Aces Total | 382 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 1191 | Total Double Faults | 307 |
| 1:39:45 | Average Match Time | 1:2:45 |
| 436.3 | Average Opponent Rank | 300.52 |
| 63% (16163/25736) | 1st Serve % | 70% (8621/12328) |
| 66% (10693/16163) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (5428/8621) |
| 51% (4884/9573) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (1891/3707) |
| 43% (1212/2788) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (518/1201) |
| 41% (10639/25657) | Return Points Win % | 40% (4842/12050) |
| 46.67% (7/8) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 60.00% (3/2) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 42.86% (3/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/4) |
| 42.40% (53/72) | Challenger W/L | 23.81% (5/16) |
| 70.20% (172/73) | Futures W/L | 55.60% (154/123) |
| 60% (234/392) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (157/300) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 47% (46/98) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (25/55) |
| 64% (82/128) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (32/81) |
| 89% (207/185) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (171/140) |
| 11% (207/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (171/31) |
| 28% (190/53) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (131/19) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
06:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction03:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction12:30 PM 18/11/25
Prediction06:30 PM 18/11/25
PredictionPotential H2H Matches This Week
Sweeny (Sydney Challenger)
Sweeny vs GengelCould play in The Semifinals
Sweeny vs JonesCould play in The Semifinals
Sweeny vs MarinkovCould play in The Semifinals
Sweeny vs KublerCould play in The Semifinals
Sweeny vs BoltCould play in The Semifinals
Sweeny vs KumasakaCould play in The Semifinals
Sweeny vs HuddCould play in The Semifinals
Sweeny vs SekulicCould play in The Semifinals
Dellavedova vs SweenyCould play in The Quarterfinals
Duckworth vs SweenyCould play in The Quarterfinals
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
07:40
H2H 0-0
08:35
H2H 0-0
12:30
H2H 0-0
13:30
H2H 0-0
13:30
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Austin
United States
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal